Build. Test. Think. Improve.
Two hands-on house construction model experiments designed to introduce Civil Engineering students to the complete Design Thinking process through creativity, prototyping and testing.
From an Idea to a Prototype
The house is only the prototype — the real experiment is the thinking process behind it.
A good civil engineer does not merely build a model. A good civil engineer observes a problem, understands the user, creates alternatives, tests the solution and improves the design.
The Design Thinking Journey
Students follow an iterative problem-solving process.
Empathize
Understand the user.
Define
Identify the problem.
Ideate
Generate solutions.
Prototype
Build the idea.
Test
Evaluate performance.
Improve
Redesign and refine.
Materials Required
Simple materials. Unlimited ideas.
Cardboard
Base, floor and structural elements.
Paper
Walls, roof and partitions.
Straws
Columns, beams and bracing.
Glue
Rigid connections.
Rubber Bands
Flexible connections.
Colour Pens
Presentation and labelling.
House Construction Experiments
Choose an experiment and follow the complete Design Thinking cycle.
Low-Cost Sustainable House
Design and construct a compact, economical and comfortable house using simple materials.
"Design a small house for a low-income family that is economical, stable, comfortable and suitable for the local climate."
๐ Suggested House Components
- Living room
- Bedroom
- Kitchen
- Toilet
- Door and windows
- Roof
- Basic structural frame
๐ Suggested Dimensions
- Cardboard base: approximately 30 × 25 cm
- Straw columns: 4–8
- Paper walls according to layout
- Lightweight roof
- Provide adequate door and window openings
EMPATHIZE — Understand the User
Students imagine themselves as the occupants of the proposed house.
- Who will live in the house?
- How many people will use it?
- What are their needs?
- Is the climate hot, rainy or windy?
- How can natural lighting be provided?
- How can ventilation be improved?
DEFINE — State the Problem
Students convert their observations into a clear engineering design statement.
"We need to design a compact, low-cost house that provides adequate space, ventilation, natural lighting and structural stability using minimum materials."
IDEATE — Generate Alternatives
Develop at least two or three alternative house layouts.
- Idea A — Courtyard house
- Idea B — Compact rectangular house
- Idea C — Sloping roof house with large windows
Select the best concept using: Cost + Stability + Comfort + Functionality + Appearance
PROTOTYPE — Build the House
- Cut the cardboard base.
- Draw the floor layout.
- Construct straw columns.
- Add horizontal beams.
- Attach paper/cardboard walls.
- Provide doors and windows.
- Construct a lightweight roof.
- Use glue and rubber bands for connections.
- Decorate and label the model.
TEST — Evaluate the Prototype
Stability
Gently apply horizontal movement. Observe whether the structure remains stable.
Roof Load
Place a small lightweight object on the roof and observe deformation.
Ventilation
Check whether adequate openings are provided for natural ventilation.
IMPROVE — Redesign
Identify weaknesses and modify the prototype.
Unstable roof → reduce roof span → add triangular support → retest.
Earthquake-Resistant Straw House
Design, construct and test a lightweight house for improved resistance to simulated earthquake movement.
"Can you design a lightweight house that remains stable when subjected to simulated earthquake vibrations?"
⚠️ Problems to Consider
- Excessive lateral movement
- Weak structural connections
- Heavy roof
- Lack of bracing
- Uneven structural arrangement
- Structural collapse
๐️ Structural Components
- Foundation/base
- Columns
- Beams
- Diagonal braces
- Flexible joints
- Lightweight roof
EMPATHIZE — Understand the Problem
Students consider the experience of people living in earthquake-prone regions.
DEFINE — Engineering Design Statement
"Design a lightweight house that can withstand simulated horizontal earthquake movement without collapsing."
IDEATE — Explore Structural Systems
Students develop different structural concepts.
RECTANGULAR FRAME ┌─────────────┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────┘ CROSS-BRACED FRAME ┌─────────────┐ │\ /│ │ \ / │ │ \ / │ │ \ / │ └─────────────┘
Question: Which configuration will move the least during the earthquake test?
PROTOTYPE — Construct the Model
- Prepare the cardboard foundation.
- Construct vertical straw columns.
- Connect horizontal beams.
- Add diagonal bracing.
- Add lightweight paper walls.
- Construct the roof.
- Use rubber bands at selected joints.
- Label columns, beams, braces and joints.
TEST — Simulated Earthquake
Place the model on a cardboard sheet and gently move the sheet horizontally left and right.
| Observation | Result |
|---|---|
| Lateral movement | Low / Medium / High |
| Roof movement | Low / Medium / High |
| Column deformation | Yes / No |
| Joint failure | Yes / No |
| Structural collapse | Yes / No |
IMPROVE — Redesign the Structure
Students modify the model after the first test.
First Prototype:
No diagonal bracing → large movement
↓
Second Prototype:
X-bracing added → reduced movement
↓
Third Prototype:
Improved joints + bracing → better stability
Compare the Two Experiments
Two different engineering problems — one common Design Thinking methodology.
| Feature | Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Theme | Low-cost sustainable housing | Earthquake resistance |
| Main Problem | Cost + comfort | Stability + safety |
| Major Material | Cardboard + paper | Straws + rubber bands |
| Civil Engineering Concept | Planning and building components | Structural stability |
| Design Thinking Focus | User needs | Safety problem |
| Testing | Stability, ventilation and roof load | Lateral vibration |
| Redesign | Improve functionality | Improve structural stability |
Student Assessment Rubric
Suggested 20-mark assessment for the laboratory activity.
| Assessment Component | Marks |
|---|---|
| Empathy / User understanding | 2 |
| Problem definition | 3 |
| Creativity of ideas | 3 |
| Prototype quality | 4 |
| Structural / functional performance | 3 |
| Testing and observations | 2 |
| Redesign / improvement | 2 |
| Team presentation | 1 |
| Total | 20 |
Student Lab Record
Students may use the following structure in their laboratory record.
๐ Record Format
- Experiment Number
- Date
- Title
- Aim
- Materials Required
- Design Problem
- User Requirements
- Initial Ideas
- Selected Design
- Prototype Sketch
๐ Observation & Reflection
- Construction Procedure
- Testing Method
- Test Results
- Problems Identified
- Modifications Made
- Final Observation
- Learning Outcome
- Team Reflection
Learning Outcomes
After completing the experiments, students should be able to:
"Prototype → Failure → Learning → Redesign"
In Design Thinking, failure is not the end of the experiment. Failure is feedback.
Think Like a Designer. Build Like an Engineer.
The best prototype is not necessarily the most beautiful one. It is the one that solves the user's problem effectively.
No comments:
Post a Comment